It's the season of Lent, which means
that many church leaders are busier than they typically are.
Actually, I'm not sure if others are, but I certainly find myself
with less time to wonder and talk about the upcoming bishop's
election.
Still, though, whenever we talk about
the appropriate qualifications for bishop, we almost always come up
with at least a few basic models for how a bishop should operate.
On the one hand, some folks want a bold
and visionary leader ~ someone who can challenge the pastors and
congregations of the synod in the work they do. Some believe we need
a bold and visionary leader who can be a voice of the church
promoting justice in the public sphere.
Others believe that the primary role of
a bishop should be as a pastor to the pastors of the synod ~ and some
would say the bishop should be a pastor to the congregations of the
synod. Under this model, the bishop would provide pastoral care to
congregations and leaders of congregations in the synod.
Another easy model to fall in to would
be for the bishop to serve as the primary administrator of the
synodical business ~ to manage official issues like pastoral
mobility, candidacy, budget, advocacy ministry, etc.
I'm not sure any of these are
appropriate job descriptions for a bishop given our current time and
location.
We live in a completely different time
and society from when our current bishop was first elected. Eighteen
years ago, very few people had cell phones, and even fewer used the
internet. Now, people all over the world access the internet using
their cell phone.
I respect our current bishop, and
appreciate the work he has done. However, it's time in our culture
and in our synod to re-think the role of bishop.
What if, today, the primary role of the
bishop and the office of the bishop, is to get out of the way of
ministry? What if the primary role of the bishop and the office of
the bishop is to receive the stories of what's happening in
congregations and among communities ~ and then to share those stories
with communities who are involved in ministry in other places?
I believe that the synod would benefit
from a bishop, and an office of the bishop, that would be primarily
concerned with facilitating networks with the goal of problem-solving
and strengthening ministry. Other than in the occasional role of
public ritual and prophetic voice, the bishop should be mostly
invisible, and instead should focus on highlighting congregational
ministry.
$0.02